…a Double-Edged Sword
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the way we live, work—and learn. In aviation, it promises powerful tools for pilots, instructors, and operational planners alike. From streamlining flight planning and simulating weather patterns to providing tailored learning platforms, AI offers incredible potential.
But like any new technology, it comes with significant caveats—particularly in education and assessment.
The Rise of AI in the Cockpit and Classroom
Flight training is no stranger to innovation. Modern pilots are expected to work hand-in-hand with increasingly sophisticated onboard systems, many of which rely on AI-driven data processing. On the ground, AI tools can generate checklists, parse weather charts, and simulate emergency procedures with impressive realism. Aviation students now have access to AI-powered tutors, dynamic question banks, and voice-assisted flight manuals.
This technological leap is meant to support learning, not replace it.
Yet a troubling trend is emerging: students leaning too heavily on AI to shortcut the learning process. Assignments, knowledge checks, and even exam prep are now frequently completed with AI’s help. With tools like ChatGPT, students can generate full answers to complex technical questions—often in seconds. The results appear thorough, grammatically sound, and even reference regulations or aircraft systems convincingly.
But here’s the catch: they’re not always right.
When AI Gets It Wrong
AI tools excel at pattern recognition and language generation. However, they lack true understanding—and, critically, accountability. While an AI model might confidently explain the principles behind an accelerated stall, it might conflate load factor with angle of attack, or misrepresent the effect of flap deployment at various speeds.
In high-stakes professions like aviation, that’s not just a technical error—it’s a potential safety hazard.
There have been documented cases where AI-generated aviation content provided misleading or incorrect answers to key questions. For example, in 2024, several pilot forums flagged AI-generated explanations about VOR navigation and RNAV procedures that appeared credible but contained dangerously inaccurate assumptions. Students who rely solely on AI outputs may absorb these errors without realising, especially if they’re under time pressure or lack the experience to spot subtle flaws.
This video shows a brilliant example of how AI can get something relatively simple wrong, and how the competent pilot can easily identify its error.
The Core Question: Who Gets the Right Answer?
Ultimately, aviation demands critical thinking, situational awareness, and a deep understanding of complex systems. AI can help reinforce these qualities—but it cannot replace them. That’s why experienced instructors, examiners, and operational mentors remain irreplaceable.
As AI becomes embedded in flight operations and training, the key challenge is not “Can AI answer this?” but rather: “Can the student understand why the answer is right—or wrong?”
Navigating the Future Responsibly
At Consult DCT, we embrace the benefits of AI when used as a tool—not a crutch. We encourage students and professionals to approach AI critically: test its outputs, cross-reference with trusted sources, and always apply human judgment.
The future of aviation will undoubtedly be shaped by AI—but it’s the human pilot who must remain in command.
